Environmental Health News

What's Working

  • Garden Mosaics projects promote science education while connecting young and old people as they work together in local gardens.
  • Hope Meadows is a planned inter-generational community containing foster and adoptive parents, children, and senior citizens
  • In August 2002, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board voted to ban soft drinks from all of the district’s schools

#592 - Incineration News, 01-Apr-1998

The decade of the 1980s saw tremendous growth in the U.S. solid waste
incineration industry. In 1980, the U.S. was burning only 1.8% of its
solid waste but by 1990 that number had grown 8-fold to 15.2%.[1,pg.4]
Despite this surge of growth, by 1990 the incineration industry was
stalled, its future in doubt. Grass-roots anti-incinerator activism had
taken hold.

In 1990, 140 incinerators were operating in the U.S. with a total
capacity of 92,000 tons per day but a more revealing fact is this one:
between 1982 and 1990, 248 incinerator projects (with a combined
capacity of 114,000 tons per day) were canceled.[1,pgs.4,215] As the
'90s unfolded, prospects for the incineration industry continued to
fade as more projects were canceled. Some operating incinerators were
prematurely shut down, such as the one at Glen Cove, Long Island, which
closed in 1991 after only 8 years of service.[2]

In 1990, U.S. EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] estimated that by
the year 2000 the U.S. would be incinerating 26% of its solid waste,
but by 1992 EPA had lowered that estimate to 21%.[1,pg.5] Now even that
reduced estimate seems overly optimistic. Grass-roots activism at the
local level has brought growth in the incinerator industry to a crawl.

The key concern among grass-roots activists is health. Incinerators
release carcinogenic (cancer-causing) and toxic chemicals from their
smoke stacks, including heavy metals (such as arsenic, lead, cadmium,
mercury, chromium and beryllium); acid gases, including hydrogen
fluoride;[1,pg.11] partially-burned organic material such as polyvinyl
chloride (PVC), herbicide residues, and wood preservatives; other
organic chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs);
and dioxins and furans.[3] One recent analysis identified 192 volatile
organic compounds being emitted by a solid waste incinerator.[4]

Several PAHs and dioxins and furans are known or suspected human
carcinogens. Dioxins were named as "known" human carcinogens by the
World Health Organization in 1997.[5]

Now a series of reports from around the world have cast even more doubt
on the safety of solid waste incineration, further dimming the
industry's prospects in the U.S.


People who live within 7.5 kilometers (4.6 miles) of a municipal solid
waste incinerator have an increased likelihood of getting several
different cancers, according to a 1996 study of 14 million people
living near 72 incinerators in Britain.[6]

The British study was conducted in two stages. In stage 1, 20
incinerators were selected randomly for study. Some 3.3 million people
lived within 7.5 km of these incinerators and their cancer history was
examined. Statistically significant increases were found for all
cancers combined; stomach cancer; cancers of the colon and rectum;
liver cancer; cancer of the larynx; lung cancer; bladder cancer; and
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Among people living within 3 kilometers (2
miles) of an incinerator, cancers of the lymph system and leukemias
were significantly elevated, but cancers of the larynx were not.

The second stage of the study examined the cancer history of 11.4
million people living within 7.5 km of any of 52 incinerators. Among
these people, there were statistically significant increases in all
cancers; stomach cancer; cancer of the colon and rectum; liver cancer;
lung cancer; and bladder cancer.

This is the first study to examine the cancer hazards of municipal
solid waste incinerators among the general population. The researchers
point out that their study cannot demonstrate cause-and-effect because
there was no measurement of exposure of the populations living near the
incinerators. The authors did take into account confounding factors,
such as the effects of poverty ("deprivation" is the term they use),
but the relationship between incinerators and cancer remained strong,
providing real cause for concern among people who live within 5 miles
of a solid waste burner.


According to Paul Connett, chemistry professor at St. Lawrence
University in Canton, N.Y., three French solid waste incinerators were
closed in January of this year because milk from cows on nearby dairy
farms was found contaminated with excessive levels of dioxins. Dioxins
are a toxic family of unwanted byproducts of incineration.[7]

According to the Guardian (London) September 16, 1997, dioxin was found
late last summer in French cheeses and butter at levels exceeding
safety standards set by the Council of Europe.

And March 11, 1998, a private organization in France, the National
Center for Independent Information on Waste (E-mail: toxoid@club-
internet.fr), revealed that a municipal incinerator near Maubeuge in
northern France, has contaminated cows' milk at levels of 22 parts per
trillion (ppt) in milk fat. Staff members at the National Center say
they believe this is the highest dioxin level ever measured in milk in
France and they are calling for a moratorium on the construction of new
incinerators. France has announced plans to build 100 new solid waste
incinerators by the year 2002.[7]


The NEW YORK TIMES reported April 27, 1997 (pg. 10) that dioxins from
trash incinerators have become an important public issue in Japan,
which has 1850 operating incinerators. The TIMES says that, in
neighborhoods downwind from incinerators, independent scientists have
reported infant deaths 40% to 70% higher than average. These claims
have not been verified.

Even the U.S. Navy is complaining publicly that the U.S. base at Atsugi
is being dangerously contaminated by a nearby garbage incinerator. More
than 6600 Americans live within a kilometer (0.6 miles) of the
incinerator. Rear Admiral Michael Haskins, the Navy's top commander in
Japan, recently wrote Japanese officials saying, "People who reside or
work at... Atsugi are breathing the poorest and the worst dioxin-
polluted air in Japan" and "suffer damage to their health every day."
Admiral Haskins told the INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE "The incinerator
is my number one priority in Japan."[8]

Japan burns 76% of its municipal solid waste. During the 1980s,
proponents of incineration in the U.S. often pointed to Japanese
incinerators as clean and safe. For example, in 1987, Allen Herskowitz
wrote, "Japanese [incineration] workers spend 6 to 18 months learning
how toxic chemicals are stabilized in the furnace and captured in the
stack, and they must have an engineering degree and undergo on-site
training.... Americans have much to learn from their overseas
counterparts about handling solid waste without undue risk to human
health."[9] At the time Herskowitz worked for Inform, Inc., a
mainstream environmental organization that took the position that
incineration could be made tolerably safe. This viewpoint did not
prevail. Instead, the grass-roots environmental movement engaged in
hand-to-hand combat with hundreds of proposed incinerators, killing 248
of them, thus crippling the U.S. incineration industry.

--Peter Montague (National Writers Union, UAW Local 1981/AFL-CIO)


[1] T. Randall Curlee and others, WASTE-TO-ENERGY IN THE UNITED STATES
(Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books, 1994). ISBN 0-89930-844-9.

[2] John T. McQuiston, "Embattled L.I. Incinerator to Go Way of
Shoreham," NEW YORK TIMES March 13, 1996, pg. B6.

[3] Julia G. Brody and Terry Greene, INCINERATION: DECISIONS FOR THE
1990S (Boston, Mass.: Tellus Institute and JSI Center for Environmental
Health Studies, 1994). Available from JSI Center for Environmental
health Studies, 210 Lincoln St., Boston, MA 02111; telephone (617) 482-

[4] K. Jay and L. Steiglitz, "Identification and Quantification of
Volatile Organic Components in Emissions of Waste Incineration Plants,"
CHEMOSPHERE Vol. 30, No. 7 (1995), pgs. 1249-1260, identified the
following volatile organic chemicals emitted from a solid waste
incinerator stack: pentane; trichlorofluoromethane; acetonitrile;
acetone; iodomethane; dichloromethane; 2-methyl-2-propanol; 2-
methylpentane; chloroform; ethyl acetate; 2,2-dimethyl-3-pentanol;
cyclohexane; benzene; 2-methylhexane; 3-methylhexane; 1,3-
dimethylcyclopentane; 1,2-dimethylcyclopentane; trichloroethene;
heptane; methylcyclohexane; ethylcyclopentane; 2-hexanone; toluene;
1,2- dimethylcyclohexane; 2-methylpropyl acetate; 3-methyleneheptane;
paraldehyde; octane; tetrachloroethylene; butanoic acid ethyl ester;
butyl acetate; ethylcyclohexane; 2-methyloctane; dimethyldioxane; 2-
furanecarboxaldehyde; chlorobenzene; methyl hexanol;
trimethylcyclohexane; ethyl benzene; formic acid; xylene; acetic acid;
aliphatic carbonyl; ethylmethylcyclohexane; 2-heptanone; 2-
butoxyethanol; nonane; isopropyl benzene; propylcyclohexane;
dimethyloctane; pentanecarboxylic acid; propyl benzene; benzaldehyde;
5- methyl-2-furane carboxaldehyde; 1-ethyl-2-methylbenzene; 1,3,5-
trimethylbenzene; trimethylbenzene; benzonitrile;
methylpropylcyclohexane; 2-chlorophenol; 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene;
phenol; 1,3-dichlorobenzene; 1,4-dichlorobenzene; decane;
hexanecarboxylic acid; 1-ethyl-4-methylbenzene; 2-
methylisopropylbenzene; benzyl alcohol; trimethylbenzene; 1-methyl-3-
propylbenzene; 2-ethyl-1,4-dimethylbenzene; 2-methylbenzaldehyde; 1-
methyl-2-propylbenzene; methyl decane; 4-methylbenzaldehyde; 1-ethyl-
3,5-dimethylbenzene; 1-methyl-(1-pro-penyl)benzene; bromochlorobenzene;
4-methylphenol; benzoic acid methyl ester; 2-chloro-6-methylphenol;
ethyldimethylbenzene; undecane; heptanecarboxylic acid; 1-
(chloromethyl)-4-methylbenzene; 1,3-diethylbenzene; 1,2,3-
trichlorobenzene; 4-methylbenzyl alcohol; ethylhex anoic acid; ethyl
benzaldehyde; 2,4-dichlorophenol; 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene; naphthalene;
cyclopentasiloxanedecamethyl; methyl acetophenone; ethanol-1-(2-
butoxyethoxy); 4-chlorophenol; benzothiazole; benzoic acid; octanoic
acid; 2-bromo-4-chlorophenol; 1,2,5-trichlorobenzene; dodecane;
bromochlorophenol; 2,4-dichloro-6-methylphenol; dichloromethylphenol;
hydroxybenzonitrile; tetrachlorobenzene; methylbenzoic acid;
trichlorophenol; 2-(hydroxymethyl) benzoic acid; 2-ethylnaphthalene-
1,2,3,4-tetrahydro; 2,4,6-trichlorophenol; 4-ethylacetophenone; 2,3,5-
trichlorophenol; 4-chlorobenzoic acid; 2,3,4-trichlorophenol; 1,2,3,5-
tetrachlorobenzene; 1,1'biphenyl (2-ethenyl-naphthalene); 3,4,5-
trichlorophenol; chlorobenzoic acid; 2-hydroxy-3,5-
dichlorobenzaldehyde; 2-methylbiphenyl; 2-nitrostyrene(2-
nitroethenylbenzene); decanecarboxylic acid;
hydroxymethoxybenzaldehyde; hydroxychloroacetophenone; ethylbenzoic
acid; 2,6-dichloro-4-nitrophenol; sulphonic acid m.w. 192; 4-bromo-2,5-
dichlorophenol; 2-ethylbiphenyl; bromodichlorophenol; 1(3H)-
isobenzofuranone-5-methyl; dimethylphthalate; 2,6-di-tertiary-butyl-p-
benzoquinone; 3,4,6-trichloro-1-methyl-phenol; 2-tertiary-butyl-4-
methoxyphenol; 2,2'-dimethylbiphenyl; 2,3'-dimethylbiphenyl;
pentachlorobenzene; bibenzyl; 2,4'-dimethylbiphenyl; 1-methyl-2-
phenylmethylbenzene; benzoic acid phenyl ester; 2,3,4,6-
tetrachlorophenol; tetrachlorobenzofurane; fluorene; phthalic ester;
dodecanecarboxylic acid; 3,3'-dimethylbiphenyl; 3,4'-dimethylbiphenyl;
hexadecane; benzophenone; tridecanoic acid; hexachlorobenzene;
heptadecane; fluorenone; dibenzothiophene; pentachlorophenol; sulphonic
acid m.w. 224; phenanthrene; tetradecanecarboxylic acid; octadecane;
phthelic ester; tetradecanoic acid isopropyl ester; caffeine; 12-
methyltetradecacarboxylic acid; pentadecacarboxylic acid;
methylphenanthrene; nonedecane; 9-hexadecene carboxylic acid;
anthraquinone; dibutylphthalate; hexadecanoic acid; eicosane;
methylhexadecanoic acid; fluoroanthene; pentachlorobiphenyl;
heptadecanecarboxylic acid; octadecadienal; pentachlorobiphenyl;
aliphatic amide; octadecanecarboxylic acid; hexadecane amide; docosane;
hexachlorobiphenyl; benzylbutylphthalate; aliphatic amide;
diisooctylphthalate; hexadecanoic acid hexadecyl ester; cholesterol.

[5] International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE
International Agency for Research on Cancer, February, 1997).

[6] P. Elliott and others, "Cancer incidence near municipal solid waste
incinerators in Great Britain," BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER Vol. 73
(1996), pgs. 702-710.

[7] "France: Dioxin contamination from trash incinerators," WASTE NOT
#423 (March 1998). WASTE NOT is available monthly from Ellen and Paul
Connett, editors, 82 Judson Street, Canton, NY 13617; tel. (315) 379-
9200; E-mail: wastenot@northnet,org. Highly recommended.

[8] Ellen Connett, "Japan: Massive unrest over dioxin contamination
from trash incinerators," WASTE NOT #424 (March 1998); see note 7
above. And: Ellen Connett, "Japan --Part 2 of 2," WASTE NOT #425 (March
1998); see note 7 above.

[9] Allen Herskowitz, "Burning Trash: How It Could Work," TECHNOLOGY
REVIEW (July 1987), pgs. 26-34.

Descriptor terms: incineration; grass-roots victories; msw; municipal
solid waste; glen cove, long island, ny; air pollution; dioxin;
carcinogens; cancer; studies; britain; uk; incinerator emissions
listed; world health organization; who; france; japan; cheese; butter;
paul connett; ellen connett; waste not; national center for independent
information on waste; milk; u.s. navy; allen herskowitz; inform, inc.;