Environmental Health News

What's Working

  • Garden Mosaics projects promote science education while connecting young and old people as they work together in local gardens.
  • Hope Meadows is a planned inter-generational community containing foster and adoptive parents, children, and senior citizens
  • In August 2002, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board voted to ban soft drinks from all of the district’s schools

#559 - Childhood Cancer and Pollution, 13-Aug-1997

A new peer-reviewed study in England shows that children have an
increased danger of getting cancer if they live within three to five
kilometers (2 to 3 miles) of certain kinds of industrial facilities.[1]
The study, by E.G. Knox and E.A. Gilman, finds that the danger is
greatest within a few hundred yards of pollution sources and tapers off
with distance. The incidence of childhood cancers per 100,000 children
in England and the U.S. has been rising steadily for at least 20 years.

The new study examined data for 22,458 children who died of leukemia
(cancer of the blood-forming cells) or of other cancers during the
years 1953 to 1980 in England. The study looked at home address at time
of birth and home address at time of death, then measured the physical
distance from these addresses to nearby industrial facilities.

Excesses of leukemias and other cancers among children were found near
the following kinds of industries:

** oil refineries, major oil storage installations, railside oil
distribution terminals, and factories making bitumen (a British term
for asphalt, crude petroleum and tar).

** automobile factories, auto body construction factories, and auto
body repair shops;

** major users of petroleum products including paint sprayers, fiber
glass fabricators, paint and varnish makers, manufacturers of solvents,
plastics and detergents, and galvanizers (zinc metal platers).

** users of kilns and furnaces, including steel mills, power plants,
cement manufacturers, brick makers, crematoria, and foundries for iron
and steel, aluminum, and zinc.

** airfields, railways, highways, and harbors.

This study was also interesting for what it did NOT find:

** Rubber manufacturers showed slight increases in childhood cancers
nearby, but tire manufacturing plants did not. Likewise, brake
manufacturing showed no excessive childhood cancers nearby.

** Despite the use of solvent-based cleaning, electroplating plants
showed no childhood cancer increases nearby.

** Twenty-two factories making halogenated hydrocarbons (chlorinated
and fluorinated) had no apparent effect but 32 other solvent
manufacturers showed cancer effects up to 5 kilometers (3 miles) away.

** Metal casting (aluminum and zinc), metal forming, and welding
probably account for the effects seen near automobile manufacturing
plants, the authors say. However, casting and refining of lead showed
no childhood cancer effects. The manufacture of automobile batteries,
on the other hand, exhibited strong effects. The authors speculate that
it may be the manufacture of battery casings (plastics forming, and use
of solvents) that create the childhood cancer effect, rather than the
lead itself.

** Other industries that did not seem to be associated with childhood
cancers included agricultural fertilizer rail terminals; TV
transmitters; cake and biscuit bakers; dry cell battery manufacturers;
magnetic tape makers; nuclear power plants; PVC manufacturers; and the
makers of wood preservatives.

** Benzene manufacturing plants were not associated with nearby
clusters of childhood cancers. The known leukemia hazard from benzene
may have led to special containment measures.

The findings for leukemias and for other cancers were the same.

Among children who had changed addresses between birth and death, the
cancer hazard could only be seen near the birth address, implying that
exposure to pollutants shortly before or after birth caused the
cancers.

Knox and Gilman, the authors of this study, have spent several years
developing analytic techniques for identifying small-scale cancer
clusters, usually cancers occurring within 150 to 300 meters (roughly
150 to 300 yards) of each other.[2] The authors say they are sure their
techniques can now identify cancer clusters at the neighborhood level.
"First, our recent analyses have effectively dispelled caveats about
the reality of short range case clustering and the existence of
geographically localised hazards is not now in doubt. Proximity studies
are no longer concerned with this issue and can be directed solely at
asking what those hazards might be," they say.[1]

This latest study takes these techniques the next step and links the
cancer clusters to nearby sources of pollution, particularly those
involving large quantities of petroleum.

The weakness of this latest study, the authors say, is that it cannot
rule out the possibility that there are excessively large numbers of
children living near industrialized facilities, which could create the
false impression of high cancer rates. The authors examine this
question as best they can, and they show that, in general, there are
few residences within short distances (a few hundred yards) of major
factories because associated facilities (roads, parking lots, garages,
etc.) compete for space with residential buildings.

The authors conclude that childhood cancers cluster around two general
kinds of facilities:

** producers, refiners, distributors, and industrial users of petroleum
fuels and volatile petroleum products; and

** manufacturing processes using high temperature furnaces, kilns, and
combustion chambers.

Some operations, notably internal combustion engines and oil fired
furnaces, meet both criteria.

The authors of the study say there may be three mechanisms by which
childhood cancers are caused:

** Gases and volatile organic compounds reaching children or their
pregnant mothers directly;

** Parents' germ cells being harmed during occupational exposures,
giving rise to children who are predisposed to cancers;

** Occupational contamination carried home on clothing, skin, or
breath.

Of the three mechanisms, the authors say they believe direct exposure
of children or their pregnant mothers is the most likely.

The authors say their study may have missed many local sources of
petroleum exposure of children, such as domestic and commercial heating
systems, oil storage bunkers, oil delivery spills, small machine shops,
bus stations, school or hospital chimneys, municipal incinerators,
gasoline stations, etc.

Childhood cancers could be caused by at least 3 mechanisms:

** Pollutants damaging the inherited genetic material (DNA) in cells;

** Pollutants damaging the immune system which would otherwise prevent
cancer cells from surviving;

** Pollutants damaging mechanisms of cell division. (Cancer is
uncontrolled cell division.)

These latest findings, that childhood cancers are clustered near
industrial facilities, contradict the official view of childhood
cancer, at least in the U.S. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) wrote
in 1993, "Time trends in childhood cancer are not likely to be affected
by environmental agents because very few are known that cause cancer
within the pediatric age-span, and exposures have been rare or
limited." And: "Clusters of childhood cancer occur very often by chance
and almost never because of environmental agents."[3] Nevertheless, the
NCI does say that children exposed to radiation (as at Hiroshima and
Nagasaki) can develop cancers. Exposure to benzene could cause
childhood leukemia, says NCI, because benzene affects chromosomes the
same way radiation does. The children of mothers treated with
diethylstilbestrol (DES) --a drug given to women in the 1950s to
prevent miscarriage --can develop childhood cancers, NCI acknowledges.

NCI reports that the incidence (per 100,000 children) of many childhood
cancers have increased steadily during the period 1973-1990. All
childhood cancers combined have increased at the rate of 0.9% per year
(0.9% per year among whites, and 1.0% per year among African-
Americans). Cancer of the brain and central nervous system have
increased at 1.8% per year. Leukemias have increased at 1.8% per year.
Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas have increased at 1.4% per year. Kidney cancer
has increased at 1% per year. However, thanks to surgery, radiation
treatments, and chemotherapy, death rates for all these childhood
cancers have declined steadily since 1973 at an average rate of 2.9%
per year even as the incidence rates have increased.[3]

U.S. environmental officials discourage the kind of study reported
here. Each year U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collects
data on toxic releases as self-reported by industrial polluters, thus
creating the annual Toxics Release Inventory, or TRI database, which is
authorized by federal law. However, EPA has never assigned any staff to
check the quality of the self-reported data, thus making any studies
based on the TRI data suspect. Furthermore, when John R. Stockwell, a
physician employed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
developed a technique for linking data from the TRI database with
disease rates near pollution sources in Chattanooga, Tennessee, EPA
officials immediately tried to fire Stockwell. (See REHW #366, #392.)
Because of citizen protests, Stockwell managed to keep his job, but he
has not undertaken any similar studies since then, and neither has
anyone else within EPA. EPA chief Carol Browner has issued a memo
specifically ordering EPA staff to "stay away from linking human health
effects and the TRI data." (REHW #392)

Another EPA official who tried to link industrial toxic releases to
human health has also found himself in serious trouble. Brian
Holtzclaw, an environmental engineer employed by EPA but "on loan" to
the state of Kentucky, urged the study of massive toxic releases from
an Ashland Oil refinery to see if they correlated with disease rates in
neighboring communities. He tried to bring in John Stockwell to study
Ashland's toxic discharges, and he himself released some pollution data
to local citizens. Holtzclaw was immediately terminated from his
Kentucky projects and reassigned to Atlanta, Georgia. Holtzclaw fought
the reassignment. Hundreds of environmental groups and individuals all
across the country have signed letters and petitions on Holtzclaw's
behalf. After a legal battle, EPA --without admitting any wrongdoing --
settled with Holtzclaw for $20,000 and a written promise that he could
continue to work on environmental justice issues. However, Holtzclaw's
court battle against the U.S. Department of Labor and the state of
Kentucky continues. He wants his job back in Kentucky and he wants his
court costs reimbursed.[4]

The Stockwell and Holtzclaw cases send an unmistakable message from EPA
chief Carol Browner to all EPA employees: Beware. The relationship of
pollution to human disease is a forbidden topic of study.

--Peter Montague (National Writers Union, UAW Local 1981/AFL-CIO)

=====

[1] E.G. Knox and E.A. Gilman, "Hazard proximities of childhood cancers
in Great Britain from 1953-80," JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY
HEALTH Vol. 51 (1997), pgs. 151-159.

[2] See E.G. Knox, "Spatial clustering of childhood cancers in Great
Britain," JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH Vol. 50, No. 3
(June 1996), pgs. 313-319. And: E.G. Knox, "Leukaemia clusters in
childhood: geographical analysis in Britain," JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
AND COMMUNITY HEALTH Vol. 48, No. 4 (August 1994), pgs. 369-376. And:
E.G. Knox, "Leukaemia clusters in Great Britain. 1. Space-Time
interactions," JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH Vol. 46,
No. 6 (December 1992), pgs. 566-572. And: E.G. Knox, "Leukaemia
clusters in Great Britain. 2. Geographical concentrations," JOURNAL OF
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH Vol. 46, No. 6 (December 1992), pgs.
573-576. And: E.A. Gilman, "Childhood Cancers: space-time distribution
in Britain," JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH Vol. 49, No.
2 (April 1995), pgs. 158-163.

[3] Barry A. Miller, and others, editors, SEER CANCER STATISTICS REVIEW
1973-1990 [NIH Publication No. 93-2789] (Bethesda, Maryland, 1993),
pgs. XXVII.1 to XXVII.15.

[4] Scott Learn, "Project director says EPA won't let doctor
participate," LEXINGTON [KENTUCKY] HERALD-LEADER March 20, 1994, pg.
A15. And see: Andrew Melnykovych, "EPA to Pay $20,000 settlement to
employee," THE [LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY] COURIER JOURNAL November 3, 1995,
pg. 1. And see: Southern Organizing Committee for Economic and Social
Justice (SOC), "Hundreds of Citizen Groups Call on Department of Labor
to Uphold Rights of Environmental Whistleblower," press release dated
October 11, 1996; for further information, contact SOC at (502) 776-
7874, or (404) 755-2855, or Mr. Holtzclaw himself at (404) 562-8868.

Descriptor terms: oil industry; petroleum; cancer; childhood cancers;
leukemia; brain cancer; kidney cancer; studies; england; e.g. knox;
cancer clusters; automobile manufacture; automobile repair; paint;
fiber glass; solvents; plastics; detergents; metal plating and
finishing; boilers and industrial furnaces; bifs; crematoria; iron;
steel; zinc; aluminum; cement kilns; airports; railroads harbors;
rubber manufacturers; metal casting; welding; automobile batteries;
emf; benzene; pvc; high-temperature combustion; diesel exhaust;
internal combustion engines;