Environmental Health News

What's Working

  • Garden Mosaics projects promote science education while connecting young and old people as they work together in local gardens.
  • Hope Meadows is a planned inter-generational community containing foster and adoptive parents, children, and senior citizens
  • In August 2002, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board voted to ban soft drinks from all of the district’s schools

#352 - Successful Composting Of Municipal Waste, 25-Aug-1993

There has been an exciting development in municipal solid waste (MSW)
technology, and a new quarterly publication is available that tells the
story.

A new way of producing high-quality compost from municipal solid waste
has been introduced into the U.S. from the Netherlands. It appears to
be a real alternative to incineration and landfilling; up to 40 percent
of municipal solid waste can be composted.[1] Another 20 to 40 percent
can be recycled, leaving 20 to 40 percent for the landfill. If toxins
have been removed, such a landfill need not poison the environment. No
incineration seems to be needed.

The new publication is called COMPOSTING FRONTIERS and it provides
impressively intelligent, even-handed explanations of composting
technology, its promise and its pitfalls.[2] COMPOSTING FRONTIERS fills
a need for all those communities seeking alternatives to the narrow
"burn or bury" mentality that clouds the minds of many solid waste
management officials. The new publication provides an international
perspective on solid waste problems, and it combines scientific depth
and accuracy with political savvy about what works and what doesn't.

The new composting technology is moving into the U.S. slowly but
steadily. One pilot-scale MSW composting system has been successfully
built and operated in Ocean County, New Jersey. The Ocean County Board
of Supervisors (called, in New Jersey, Freeholders) has sent plans to
the state Department of Environmental Protection and Energy (DEPE),
seeking permission to proceed with construction of a full-scale system
(250 tons per day initially; 500 tons per day eventually).[3] (Approval
is expected because the New Jersey state waste management plan
recommends composting over landfilling and incineration.)

The town of Bristol, Pennsylvania is even further along. Bristol is
presently constructing a 425-ton-perday MSW composting system, which is
scheduled to begin operating in August, 1994.

A 300-ton-per-day system began operating in the City of Rotterdam, the
Netherlands, in April, 1993, and numerous other systems are planned,
under construction, or operating, in the Netherlands and in Canada.[4]

Composting has been around for millions of years. It is a natural
process that occurs when invisible microorganisms (microbes) present in
soil eat organic matter such as leaves, banana peels and wood; the
resulting compost has the characteristics of topsoil--dark soil with no
odor or a slight, pleasant odor. Clean composts make an excellent
addition to the soil on farms, in parks and forests, or anywhere else
good soil is needed. Leaves, grass, food wastes, paper, wood chips and
sewage can all be composted readily. However, if there are toxins in
the raw material, there will be toxins in the compost. Toxic compost is
useless and dangerous. Thus, mixed municipal solid wastes cannot be
successfully composted because they contain too many toxins (such as
lead, mercury, and cadmium) to produce a clean, safe compost.

In the past, composting municipal solid waste has been tried with poor
results.

As with vendors of incinerators and landfills, vendors of composting
systems have made false claims for their technology. As a result,
communities have been bamboozled into adopting bad composting systems
that produced strong, unpleasant odors and/or a toxic compost that had
limited uses or no uses whatsoever.

Failure of a large composting system typically involves loss of about
$30 million. According to Professor Melvin S. Finstein of Rutgers
University, notable failures include the Agripost facility in Dade
County, Florida; the Reidel/Dano facility in Portland, Oregon; the
Pembroke Pines facility in Florida; and the Pigeon Point facility in
Delaware which operated for almost 10 years but was recently closed
because of odors.

The new composting technology introduced from the Netherlands employs a
closed metal container sometimes called a "Dutch tunnel" or a "mushroom
tunnel." Professor Finstein, who was the first to advocate adapting
such machines for composting solid waste, prefers to call the
technology "air recirc containers" because their key feature is
recirculation of air inside the container to give precise control of
oxygen and temperature.

Such containers have been used successfully for 20 years for composting
animal wastes such as cow manure. The resulting compost is used as a
growing medium for mushrooms--a high-priced agricultural commodity.
Because crop failure in the mushroom business is expensive, "mushroom
tunnels" are high-quality computer-controlled machines, and their
operation is thoroughly understood for composting animal wastes.

In 1991, Professor Finstein began advocating use of mushroom tunnels
for composting the organic parts of municipal solid waste. At that
time, Ocean County, New Jersey, had just gone through a bruising battle
over a proposed MSW incinerator. After two county supervisors lost an
election because they favored the incinerator, the entire county board
turned against incineration and began looking for alternatives. The
county hired Finstein to guide them in design of a pilot-scale
composting facility. The project was constructed by Wehran Engineering
of Middletown, New York using a mushroom tunnel provided by the Dutch
company, Agrisystems Engineering and Construction, b.v.

The resulting pilot system produced no odors and produced a compost
that meets all U.S. standards and most foreign standards--a subject we
will discuss more below.

The key to a successful composting program is, first, odor control. If
the program cannot achieve odor control it won't survive politically,
so the quality of the compost will not matter.

Once odor control has been achieved (and the "mushroom tunnel"
technology seems to be the key here), then the quality of the compost
becomes important. The problem is that we have allowed toxins to creep
into the manufacture of thousands of consumer and household items, and
if these items are composted, they contribute toxicity to compost. Even
lawn clippings can poison compost because many people thoughtlessly and
needlessly spray toxic pesticides on their lawns.

In the Ocean County project, the plan is to compost the following
categories of waste: kitchen organics; disposable diapers; cat litter;
yard waste from communities that do not offer leaf and grass
composting; food waste from commercial establishments and institutions
such as schools, hospitals, nursing homes, restaurants, and
supermarkets; and that fraction of mixed paper, such as food packaging,
that is currently not recyclable. They have set the modest goal of
composting 20 to 22 percent of the waste presently going to the Ocean
County Landfill (which is privately owned and operated, though in New
Jersey private landfills are regulated as public utilities with rates
set by a Board of Regulatory Commissioners, a public agency).

The Ocean County project will be located on the landfill property and
will be privately financed by the landfill owner. The plan is to
separate wastes at the source and to collect separated "green bag
wastes" for composting. Wehran Engineering's Wes Gavett, manager of the
Ocean County project [phone: (914) 3430660], told us that collecting
green waste separately will increase the county's cost of collection 10
to 15 percent. The county will make up for this cost by having a two-
tiered rate structure at the landfill. Separated green wastes will be
accepted at the landfill for about $40 per ton; unseparated, mixed
wastes will be accepted at the landfill for about $70 per ton.

Ironically, MSW composting in the U.S. may be defeated by poor
regulations. The federal EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] has
no regulations for quality of compost, and no plans for creating any.
Under Section 503 of the Clean Water Act, EPA has created regulations
for municipal sewage sludge and EPA takes the position that those
regulations could apply to compost.

Unfortunately, EPA used risk assessment to establish its standards for
sewage sludge, and the resulting standards are very permissive. For
example, EPA defines sewage sludge containing 300 parts per million
(ppm) of toxic lead as "high quality" and allows it to be applied to
agricultural land. A buildup of toxic lead in soils would almost
certainly occur after prolonged use of compost containing 300 ppm of
lead. In contrast, present Dutch regulations only allow 120 ppm lead in
sludge or compost, and after January 1, 1995, Dutch regulations will
allow only 65 ppm. Germany only allows 100 ppm of lead in compost. The
Canadian guideline for lead in compost is 83 ppm.[5]

The U.S. EPA's permissive standards will allow compost that is toxic to
be defined as "clean" or "acceptable" or "high quality." Thus U.S.
regulations will encourage production of compost that will poison
soils, which will in the long run reduce public confidence in compost
(and in government regulations).

To succeed with MSW composting, state and local governments will need
to pay attention to the quality of compost themselves, and not be
seduced by the dangerously permissive regulations of U.S. EPA.

--Peter Montague

=====

[1] One composting operation, in Fillmore County, Minnesota reportedly
is composting 50 percent of its municipal solid waste; see Tom Richard,
"MSW Composts: Impacts of Separation on Trace Metal Contamination,"
COMPOSTING FRONTIERS Vol. I No. 3 (Spring, 1993), pgs. 13-22, but we
have no information on the toxicity of the resulting compost, so we
remain skeptical of the 50% figure. See footnote 2 below.

[2] An annual subscription to COMPOSTING FRONTIERS costs $35 for
individuals, $20 for students, and $70 for government, consultants and
businesses. GET: COMPOSTING FRONTIERS, 19 Girard Place, Maplewood, NJ
07040-3107; phone (201) 7624912; fax: (201) 761-5415.

[3] The Ocean County project is described in detail in a series of
interviews and articles in COMPOSTING FRONTIERS Vol. I No. 2 (Winter
1993). See footnote 2 above.

[4] Melvin S. Finstein, "Status of the Transition to Air Recirc [MSW
Composting] Systems," COMPOSTING FRONTIERS Vol. I. No. 2 (Winter 1993)
is a table briefly describing 18 projects in various stages in the
U.S., Canada and the Netherlands. We confirmed the status of these
projects with Professor Finstein by phone [(908) 932-9735] August 24,
1993.

[5] Compost quality standards are the subject of six articles in
COMPOSTING FRONTIERS Vol. I No. 3 (Spring 1993). See especially the
table on pg. 23 comparing various standards. See footnote 2, above.

Descriptor terms: msw; composting; landfilling; recycling; composting
frontiers; publications; ocean county, nj; nj; bristol, nj; pa;
rotterdam; netherlands; canada; soil quality; toxicity; lead; mercury;
cadmium; mel finstein; agripost; dade county, fl; portland, or; or;
pembroke pines, fl; pigeon point, de; de; dutch tunnels; mushroom
tunnels; agriculture; economics; wehran engineering; agrisystems
engineering and construction; clean water act; sewage sludge;
regulation; epa;