Environmental Health News

What's Working

  • Garden Mosaics projects promote science education while connecting young and old people as they work together in local gardens.
  • Hope Meadows is a planned inter-generational community containing foster and adoptive parents, children, and senior citizens
  • In August 2002, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board voted to ban soft drinks from all of the district’s schools

#116 - Analyzing Why All Landfills Leak, 13-Feb-1989

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paid for a series of
engineering studies to find out the best way to make a landfill. They
wanted to know what was the "best demonstrated available
technology" (BDAT) for making landfills. These studies reach some
surprising conclusions.

Landfills are bathtubs in the ground; the bottom of the bathtub is
called a liner and it can be made of compacted clay soil, or it can be
made of a huge sheet of plastic underlain by ordinary soil, or it can
be a huge sheet of plastic underlain by a layer of compacted soil
(usually clay soil). The third combination, plastic liner and compacted
soil, is called a "composite liner." (A composite liner is not a double
liner; it is a single liner made up of two parts; to create a double
liner, you would use two composite liners together, separated by a
layer of sand or gravel.) Geoservices did not examine the second type
of liner (plastic sheet on ordinary soil) because ordinary soil
provides poor support for a plastic liner carrying many tons of weight,
so they restricted their analysis to compacted clay liners vs.
composite liners.

The EPA wanted to know which liners were the best ones available:
compacted clay liners, or composite soil liners? So they hired
Geoservices (of Boyton, Florida) to tell them. The resulting study
makes dull reading because it is filled with technical details, but the
conclusions are fascinating. All liners perform worse than anyone
suspected.

Clay liners

Geoservices didn't have much good to say about clay liners. The flow of
liquids through a liner (the liner's permeability) is measured in
centimeters per second (cm/s). The EPA's current requirement for a
liner for a hazardous waste landfill is that it pass liquids through it
no faster than 10-7 cm/s (read ten to the minus seven centimeters per
second, or one ten millionth of a centimeter per second). However,
based on actual experience in the field, Geoser vices concludes that
this ideal permeability is often not achieved for a variety of reasons.
(See pgs. 3-3 through 3-8; case studies of clay liners appear in
Appendix A.) Therefore, they assume that the actual permeability in the
real world lies between 10-7 and 10-6 cm/s. Geoservices concludes,
"Possibly the most significant observation is that with compacted
[clay] soil bottom liners, leakage out of the [landfill] will be large
(if there is leakage through the top liner).... even in [landfills]
meeting current EPA design requirements" including permeability of 10-7
cm/s (pg. 3-18). By "large" leakage, Geoservices means 90 gallons of
fluid leaking through each acre each day, or 900 gallons per day
leaking from a 10-acre landfill. Their calculations show that, with 3
inches of water standing on the bottom liner, it will take 15 years for
leakage to break through a 3-foot-thick compacted clay bottom liner,
but once breakthrough has occurred, 90 gallons per acre per day will
pass through the liner continuously thereafter. (See pg. 3-16, and
Table 3-3 on pg. 3-40.) It won't take very long to contaminate a large
drinking water supply if you pour 90 to 900 gallons of toxics into it
day after day, year after year. Thus Geoservices has shown that clay
liners are an environmental disaster.

Composite liners

Geoservices reports that all plastic liners (also called Flexible
Membrane Liners, or FMLs) always have some leaks. "A common
misconception regarding FMLs is that they are impermeable, that is, no
fluid will pass through an intact FML. However, it is important to
realize that all materials used as liners are at least slightly
permeable to liquids or gases and a certain amount of permeation
through liners should be expected. Additional leakage results from
defects such as cracks, holes, and faulty seams." (pg. 4-2)

FMLs often develop defects called "pinholes" during manufacture; these
result from thin places ("fish eyes"), bubbles, foreign material, or
lumps of carbon in the raw molten plastic from which the FML is rolled
("calendered") into sheets. Furthermore, when a large landfill liner is
created by joining strips of FML together with glue or by welding, the
resulting seams often leak. Geoservices provides some data on typical
seam defect rates. They look at six case studies (pgs. B-7 thru B-11).
Based on the six case studies, they draw the following "tentative
conclusions:" an average of one leak per 30 feet of seam can be
expected if there is no quality assurance program (quality assurance
being a third party coming along behind with special equipment to check
the adequacy of the seams). Even with good quality assurance, "an
average of one leak per 1000 feet of seam can be expected with
reasonably good installation, adequate quality assurance, and repair of
noted defects." (pg. B-11) That is to say, under the best of
circumstances, you'll get one leak per thousand feet of seam. If the
landfill liner is made by welding strips of FML that are each 20 to 30
feet wide, you can expect one to two defective seams in each acre of
landfill.

Based on actual data, Geoservices concludes that a "standard" (typical)
leak in an FML has an area of one square centimeter (1/16 of a square
inch) and that the "standard" (average) number is one hole per acre.
They point out that this "standard" hole size and standard number per
acre are based on the assumption that "intensive quality assurance
monitoring" will be performed during liner installation, so clearly we
are talking about the best case, not the worst case here. Design flaws,
poor construction practice, or poor quality assurance would result in
larger holes, greater numbers of holes, or even large tears. (pg. B-13)

Geoservices then goes through an elaborate mathematical analysis to
figure out how much fluid will pass through a composite liner under the
best possible conditions and under less ideal (but still optimistic)
conditions. They conclude (pg. B-41) that the "best demonstrated
available technology" (BDAT) for composite landfills liners will allow
leakage rates somewhere between 0.02 and 1.0 gallons per acre per day.
(See Table B-10 on pg. B-51.) Thus they conclude that a 10-acre
landfill will have a leak rate somewhere between 0.2 and 10 gallons per
day, or between 73 and 3650 gallons of fluid per year; over 10 years,
such a landfill will allow the leaking of 730 to 36,500 gallons of
fluid. And this is the "best demonstrated available technology"--the
very best we can do when everything goes right.

Next week we will show that leaking 730 to 36,500 gallons of toxics
into a water supply during a 10-year period guarantees destruction of
the drinking water resource.

We will also show that the Geoservices study is unduly optimistic
because, as they say themselves (pg. B-7), "Many tupes of FMLs swell
when placed in contact with chemicals. As a result, the distance
between polymeric chains increases and permeability increases.
Therefore, an FML can have a low permeability for water and a high
permeability for some chemicals."

If you're interested in technical details, get: Geoservices, Inc.,
BACKGROUND DOCUMENT ON BOTTOM LINER PERFORMANCE IN DOUBLE-LINED
LANDFILLS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. Springfield, Va: National Technical
Information Service, April, 1987. Order from National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, Va 22161; phone (703) 487-4650. Order
No. PB87-18229-1. $36.95."

--Peter Montague

=====

Descriptor terms: landfilling; landfill design; clay liners; flexible
membrane liners; epa; geoservices; best demonstrated available
technology; composite liners; leaks; leak rates; statistics; leakage;